We use analytics to understand how visitors use this site. No personal or workforce data is collected. See our Privacy Policy.
Align workforce capacity with business goals—grounded in data, not guesswork.
Demand vs. capacity by quarter
Scenario comparison
Align workforce capacity with business goals—grounded in data, not guesswork. Workforce Planning Suite provides evidence-based capacity scenarios, headcount modeling, and eliminates disconnected spreadsheets by building directly on certified position and assignment data.
PMO Leader
Coordinates project staffing and portfolio-level resourcing.
Workforce Planning Leader
Owns the organization's capacity and demand planning process.
Resource Planning Manager
Plans resource allocation across projects and locations.
Finance Planning Leader
Aligns workforce plans with budget and forecast cycles.
The forward-looking layer — evidence-based capacity scenarios, headcount modeling, eliminating disconnected spreadsheets.
Align workforce capacity with business goals—grounded in data, not guesswork.
Model headcount scenarios and hiring ramp curves without fragile spreadsheets.
Move from reactive staffing surprises to predictable, planned capacity.
Every capability is labeled Available, Planned, Future, or Requires Product Owner Review — Planned capabilities have an approved specification and are on the near-term roadmap; Future capabilities have no committed release timeline yet.
Available, committed, and remaining workforce capacity by period — forward confidence in where headroom exists to plan into.
For Workforce Planning Leader.
Demand and capacity compared quarter by quarter — gap visibility before it becomes a staffing crisis, not after.
For Resource Planning Manager.
Positions and assignments are real today — a governed status lifecycle from planned to open to filled to closed.
For PMO Leader.
Skill demand, current evidence, and gap — capability risk surfaced ahead of demand, so hiring or training decisions can start earlier.
For Workforce Planning Leader.
Skill coverage against planning need — darker cells indicate a wider gap.
Baseline and alternative scenarios compared before committing — feasibility flagged per scenario, not just totals, with no guaranteed outcome.
For Finance Planning Leader.
Resourcing transparency across internal, contingent, and location-based supply — rebalance before a team is overcommitted.
For Resource Planning Manager.
Required versus assigned headcount by project — portfolio staffing confidence, and which project is under- or over-staffed.
For PMO Leader.
Rolling, quarterly, and annual planning cycles — the shared reference so every planning discussion aligns on the same time frame.
For Workforce Planning Leader.
A governed role or headcount slot, tracked independently of any one worker, with a clear status lifecycle from planned to filled to closed.
Know exactly who occupies which position and when, with effective-dated assignment history and no overlapping records.
Define headcount, FTE, and skill demand against current and future workforce supply — an approved capability on the near-term roadmap.
Compare baseline and alternative workforce scenarios with named assumptions and human-selected outcomes.
A position moves from Planned to Open to Filled as it's created, posted, and assigned to a worker — with status and assignment history retained throughout.
Compare demand (headcount, FTE, skills) against current and projected supply, surfacing gaps with severity and recommended response options.
Define two alternative scenarios with different assumptions, run both, and compare outcomes side by side before a human makes the final call.
Consistent filter dimensions across every view in this suite.
Plan version history
Draft, review, approved, and published plan versions with full lifecycle tracking.
Capacity and gap reports
Exportable capacity, demand, and gap-analysis reports.
Scenario comparison exports
Side-by-side scenario outcome comparisons for planning reviews.
Built for teams who need to plan capacity ahead of the need — not react once it's already a problem.
Governed plan lifecycle
Plans move through draft, review, approval, and publication states, each with its own control — no plan is silently activated.
No autonomous optimization authority
Optimization and scenario tools surface bounded, explainable proposals — a human always makes the final planning decision.
Role-scoped planning access
Authorized planning owners, finance, and executive roles each see only the planning data their role is scoped to.
See how this suite fits your organization.